A fresh wave of criticism has hit the All Progressives Congress (APC), following a blunt assertion by party chieftain Akin Ogunbiyi that the ruling party no longer practices internal democracy but has instead become one dictated by “Baba sọpé”—a Yoruba expression loosely implying unquestioned submission to a single authority.
This is not just another political jab; it is a serious indictment coming from within the party’s own ranks. When insiders begin to question the democratic integrity of their platform openly, it signals deeper structural issues that can no longer be ignored.
At the heart of Ogunbiyi’s claim is a concern many political observers have quietly raised over the years: that decision-making within the APC has become increasingly centralized, with power concentrated in the hands of a few influential figures. In such an environment, consensus is often replaced by compliance, and merit can be overshadowed by allegiance.
The implications are far-reaching. A political party that struggles with internal democracy inevitably faces challenges in candidate selection, policy direction, and conflict resolution. Aspirants may feel sidelined, party members may become disillusioned, and the electorate may begin to question the credibility of a system that appears predetermined rather than participatory.
The situation becomes even more complicated when multiple power blocs emerge within the same party. Contrary to the idea of a single guiding authority, critics argue that the APC is, in reality, controlled by several competing interests. This fragmentation often leads to inconsistent decisions, delayed strategies, and, at times, outright contradictions in party positions. Instead of clarity, there is confusion. Instead of unity, there is quiet rivalry.
In states like Osun, where political stakes are high ahead of the 2026 governorship election, such internal disarray could prove costly. While the opposition consolidates and strengthens its grassroots appeal, a divided APC risks entering the race weakened—not necessarily by the strength of its opponents, but by its own internal struggles.
Ogunbiyi’s statement, therefore, should not be dismissed as mere political rhetoric. It reflects a broader concern about the sustainability of a party structure that appears increasingly top-heavy and less responsive to its base. Democracy, even within political parties, thrives on inclusion, debate, and transparent processes—not directives handed down without consultation.
What we are witnessing today is not just political maneuvering it is a glaring display of entrenched godfatherism at its peak within the APC. These unfolding events expose a system where decisions are dictated by a few powerful individuals rather than reflecting the genuine will of the people.
However, Osun State is not a ground for imposed leadership. The people of Osun have consistently shown that their voices can not be silenced or overridden by elite interests. The growing resistance against these undemocratic tendencies is proof that the era of political imposition is being firmly rejected.
It is evident that the people stand with Ademola Adeleke, no more, no less. Their support is not manufactured; it is rooted in lived realities and visible governance.
As we approach August 15, 2026, the resolve of the people has only strengthened. They are not just ready to vote they are determined to protect that vote. This is more than an election; it is a defining moment where the collective will of the people will prevail over godfatherism and political manipulation.
If the APC hopes to maintain its relevance and competitiveness, it must confront these criticisms head-on. Reforming internal processes, ensuring fair primaries, and reducing the dominance of entrenched interests are not just idealistic goals. They are necessary steps for survival.
E-signed: Hon Comrade James Onifade
Advocate for Good Governance and A Better Judicial System
